Measles is one of the most contagious vaccine preventable diseases, causing severe complications and deaths globally. While vaccination with a measles-containing vaccine (MCV) has prevented millions of measles deaths, recent trends, especially from low- and middle-income countries, are discouraging. Measles cases have increased since 2021 as MCV coverage has decreased; and an estimated 107,500 measles deaths, mostly in children under-five years, occurred in 2023. Thus, a renewed focus on proven and innovative strategies to control measles is needed. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a first MCV dose administered at 9–15 months of age (routine MCV1), however MCV1 below 9 months of age (early MCV1) may increase vaccination coverage because uptake of all vaccines tends to be higher the younger the child, and this might protect vulnerable infants earlier in life. However, due to concerns about possible reduced vaccine performance, early MCV1 is not routinely recommended by WHO. WHO hosted an informal technical consultation on December 6–7, 2023, in Geneva, Switzerland to evaluate recent evidence on early MCV1 and identify evidence gaps for policy making. The recent evidence suggests a robust humoral immune response shortly after early MCV1 at 5–8 months of age. Immune blunting of a routine second MCV dose (e.g., MCV2) after early MCV1 was not demonstrated in the presented data. However, 3–7 years after MCV1, children receiving early MCV1 had lower measles antibodies than children receiving routine MCV1, suggesting faster waning of immunity. The totality of evidence on immune blunting remains inconsistent. Meeting participants thought more data are needed before revisiting WHO’s current recommendation for a potential revision. Evidence gaps include: understanding measles disease burden and severity in infants; early MCV1 effectiveness and duration; vaccine-induced cellular immunogenicity; whether measles in infants is acquired from other infants or older children or adults; and blunting of routine MCV2. Addressing evidence gaps through targeted studies and measles outbreak investigations, as well as evaluations of country-level introductions of early MCV1 are warranted. Ensuring high MCV1 and MCV2 coverage remains the priority in measles control.
